It's feasible but costs money. It turns out that if you offer people incentives, they will install panels (see italy and germany) - or you have to go for solar in national infrastructure terms (see India and China).
It would be more feasable to convert it into fuel cell(liquid hydrogen) and then use it to either convert back into eletricity at a later time, use as a heating source or use it to power fuel cell cars. in the US they already have several projects using this principle.
Maybe not, but if we ALL adopted green energy solutions then...
Most green things are like that
Polar bears is an lie anyway.(they never where in the ''extinct phase'') The problem with solar panels is that the wires that deliver the power to your house are also used to transport the power the panels deliver back to the grid. But they are not strong enough for that so in moments those panels can deliver the maximum power(which is still only 10% in our climate) that will automatically switch of as overheating countermeasure. This is not my opinion or insight but what one of the dutch energy network controller/regulator says. They point was to effectively use Solar panel energy they way how they are being installed need to change instead of transporting the power to the grid you need local storage so less power gets wasted. The result for the end costumer will be the same but better, because now they see there meter go back, but with the storage solution the same think will happen but more efficient because it does'nt need to switch off as quickly.
Or how about for the amounts they charge for an ebike how about an charger that switches to ultra low power mode auto automatically once done charging?
Yeah the city of Utrecht claimed that too, than they installed 100km/h zones and it became more polluting, off course they didn't say ''oh my goss we are so wrong'' they came with a whole load of BS to cover other BS to come up with a solution that worked(banning almost all cars from the town centre, making an expensive overpass to reroute the highway. ) but they core issue was'nt speed but to much cars on one place on a few moments a day causing congestion. Those few cars at night could be doing 200km/h i wouldn't have mattered. The same as the weird obsession with forcefully closing shops at 8pm during the lockdowns would'nt have mattered much either, but the fact that the other measures did work made look like they did.
We need medium hitters - house by house is inefficient and big power companies are profit driven.
Indeed he is. I liked how even the other defendants were laughing at how Judge Hurley was wiping the floor with him.
