newfhouse
pleb
Does it mean that each and every decision taken by the Home Secretary will be liable to appeal about both the outcome and the process? In terms of legal challenge is that any different to a decision taken by a nameless bureaucrat?
Cruella Braverman...
- Thread starter Fab Foodie
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Does it mean that each and every decision taken by the Home Secretary will be liable to appeal about both the outcome and the process? In terms of legal challenge is that any different to a decision taken by a nameless bureaucrat?
D
Deleted member 28
Guest
icowden
Legendary Member
Really? Have you never heard the phrase "if you have nothing nice to say, better say nothing at all"?
D
Deleted member 28
Guest
Like the original poster of this?
Bromptonaut
Rohan Man
- Location
- Bugbrooke, Northants
Interesting opinion here from the legal blogger David Allen Green.
In brief the challenge to the policy itself was always a tall order. Challenging individual decisions on the other hand....
Getting those into a state that will pass muster at a court will stretch Home Office resources to their limit and cost a fortune.
C R
Über Member
And feeds Ms Braverman's shtick of the lefty interfering lawyers interfering with "the will of the people" and costing the country a fortune. More fodder for what passes for the press in here
.
newfhouse
pleb
And feeds Ms Braverman's shtick of the lefty interfering lawyers interfering with "the will of the people" and costing the country a fortune. More fodder for what passes for the press in here
I’m cynical enough to believe that actually sending folk to Rwanda was never the main aim. It’s an attempt to gee up their unthinking demographic and portray decent people as weak, feeble and unpatriotic. Starmer and most of his front bench have cleverly countered this, of course, by being just as vile and authoritarian as the Tories.
icowden
Legendary Member
I must have missed where the OP made a direct aggressive personal attack on a forum member. At the moment the only person I can find doing that is you?
D
Deleted member 28
Guest
You only mentioned the 'nothing nice to say' thing not about who it was particularly aimed at.
Old 'toomuchfoodie' continually posts insulting 'quips' about people with his hilarious thread titles, not to mention his favoured 'gammon ' reference.
Live by the sword, as they say.
OP
OP
Fab Foodie
Guru
Blimey, as the OP what am I supposed to have done now to upset the ignored one?
icowden
Legendary Member
So, you saw the word Gammon and automatically assumed it meant you?
Honestly? I think that says more about you than @Fab Foodie
Anyway, if you can pick your toys back up and put them in the pram, that would be nice...
D
Deleted member 28
Guest
Not at all because I neither resemble one or react like one whereas looking at pictures of the foodlemeister he certainly seems to resemble the description.
As a side note I never even realised the term existed 'till I read it on here so when I saw a picture of said poster and knowing what they are supposed to look like it seemed really rather ironic.
D
Deleted member 28
Guest
Anyway, if you can pick your toys back up and put them in the pram, that would be nice...
You make I larf you do.
D
Deleted member 28
Guest
Errr....no.
He often uses the word and when I realised what it meant and then saw a picture of him I thought 'pot, kettle and black'.
