Normal Island

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

matticus

Guru
After slagging off the BBC a couple of days ago, we now have this stone cold classic.


View: https://youtu.be/isiVdlz8bDY?si=_DQaG4BPucLhh-m2


I’m still none the wiser about the difference between Jungle and Drum N Bass.


p.s. how the hell is this in the Public Interest? Eh?!?
 

icowden

Legendary Member
Some good news folks. Apparently Rishi's government is going to get behind creating a specific criminal offence for stealing cats and dogs. Anyone convicted would be subject to punishments ranging from a fine to up to 5 years in prison.

Currenty the theft of a pet is covered by the non-specific Theft Act. The punishment for theft ranges from a fine to up to 6 years in prison.

So good news for anyone thinking of stealing a pet!!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68021178

The desperation of this lot to try and do things to win votes is frankly depressing.
Ms Clarke told the BBC that, with nearly half of households owning a pet, it would be a hugely popular measure.
Ms Clarke omitted to mention to people that an offence already exists with the potential for harsher punishment than that proposed.
 

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
Some good news folks. Apparently Rishi's government is going to get behind creating a specific criminal offence for stealing cats and dogs. Anyone convicted would be subject to punishments ranging from a fine to up to 5 years in prison.

Currenty the theft of a pet is covered by the non-specific Theft Act. The punishment for theft ranges from a fine to up to 6 years in prison.

So good news for anyone thinking of stealing a pet!!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68021178

The desperation of this lot to try and do things to win votes is frankly depressing.

Ms Clarke omitted to mention to people that an offence already exists with the potential for harsher punishment than that proposed.

Is it specifically cats and dogs as it's being reported? Or any pet as it seems to read in the article? I find the coverage a bit discriminatory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Bazzer

Active Member
Is it specifically cats and dogs as it's being reported? Or any pet as it seems to read in the article? I find the coverage a bit discriminatory.
The short answer is just dogs and cats.
Looking at the bill, it is divided into 3 sections: abduction of dogs, abduction of cats and "abduction of other animals commonly kept as pets".
However, the seemingly catch all of other animals is not what it first appears. A species would need to be brought into the legislation by an appropriate national authority. - Generally speaking, the Secretary of State by means of a statutory instrument.
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
That's why you don't feed other people's cats.

Absolutely. A neighbour used to do that and it did my head in. More recently one of mine did a runner for the same reason. All amicable and she's happy, but I have a different attitude to cats than most people I think.
 

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
Absolutely. A neighbour used to do that and it did my head in. More recently one of mine did a runner for the same reason. All amicable and she's happy, but I have a different attitude to cats than most people I think.

It's just the rules. Fuss them, stroke them, play with them but don't feed them and don't let them in your house.

The short answer is just dogs and cats.
Looking at the bill, it is divided into 3 sections: abduction of dogs, abduction of cats and "abduction of other animals commonly kept as pets".
However, the seemingly catch all of other animals is not what it first appears. A species would need to be brought into the legislation by an appropriate national authority. - Generally speaking, the Secretary of State by means of a statutory instrument.

Anybody know a good axolotl lawyer?
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
It's just the rules. Fuss them, stroke them, play with them but don't feed them and don't let them in your house.



Anybody know a good axolotl lawyer?

Yeah, I had that conversation with her. She didn't get it and thought she was helping. Hey ho, some people can be like that I guess.
 

Mr Celine

Well-Known Member
The BBC news website just seems to be turning into the one show. Totally vacuous.
Neither of these two stories from today are worthy of a local paper, let alone the BBC.

Woman finds quite a big onion.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/england/essex

Deer enters someone’s garden in the snow.

View: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-scotland-67994453


Where is the public interest in any of this?


It's not even as if the deer is doing anything unusual.

It might have been a story if it was this one -



... and they could have followed it up with an interview with Derek Adams explaining why he hadn't been signed by the Staggies, who failed to score in their 0 - 3 defeat to Partick Thistle in the Scottish Cup yesterday.
 

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
It's not even as if the deer is doing anything unusual.

It might have been a story if it was this one -



... and they could have followed it up with an interview with Derek Adams explaining why he hadn't been signed by the Staggies, who failed to score in their 0 - 3 defeat to Partick Thistle in the Scottish Cup yesterday.


Well it's having a better time than this one, that's for sure.


View: https://twitter.com/BiffDon/status/1748689644949004496?t=pOrlR6TeGEZ-ci6maK2DxA&s=19
 
Top Bottom